If a button could expand the Everything search to include results from the Windows search index I think that could be both efficient and useful. If that doesnt suit you, our users have ranked more than 50 alternatives to Copernic Desktop Search and four of them are Application Launchers so hopefully you can find a suitable replacement. I can't always remember if I stored some critical note in a txt file or as an Outlook note, etc. The best Application Launcher alternative to Copernic Desktop Search is Spotlight, which is free. However, sometimes I have to do 2 searches to find what I need, once in Everything and if that fails I'll search in Windows. That's where Everything comes in as it's very lean and efficient and I tend to use long filenames specifically to make searching easier. Kasm is changing the way that businesses deliver digital workspaces using our open-source web-native container streaming technology to establish a modern devops delivery of Desktop as a Service (DaaS), application streaming, and browser isolation. But it's too resource hungry to turn it on for everything. Kasm Workspaces is a container streaming platform for delivering browser, desktop and application workloads to the web browser. I've tweaked my Windows search settings to index content only on a select list of folders where it's sometimes useful as well as indexing my e-mail and Outlook data. DocFetcher is an Open Source desktop search application: It allows you to search the contents of files on your computer. Since Vista and Windows 7 have Windows search integrated and many people are probably using it on XP through download, it's better to integrate its results rather than implement a content searching feature within Everything. I look forward to seeing what's in store for the future of Copernic.I don't know if it's possible, but if you can access Windows Desktop search through an API I think that might be a useful addition for searching content and as well as non-file data (e-mail, outlook notes, etc.). I'd love to see "alternative" programs like OpenOffice included in the index (they already handle Firefox web histories). The best open source Linux alternative is DocFetcher. I'd like to see them go the extra step between a good interface and a great one. Copernic Desktop Search is not available for Linux but there are some alternatives that runs on Linux with similar functionality. Its current feature set is implemented so solidly that I feel its developers must be itching to make it an even more comprehensive search tool. You always know what it's doing and why.Ĭopernic is very satisfying to use, but I can't help but wish it could do more. The program's logic never becomes indecipherable. You can even tell it to toss out the current index and start from scratch. You can dictate when indexing is done, what kinds of files are indexed, and which files can't be indexed. You are given a lot of control over how Copernic runs. Find the top alternatives to Copernic Desktop Search currently available. Their small size feels out of balance with the large data sets they manipulate. Something as simple as increasing the size of the grouping controls would make a significant difference. This approach works fine for search options (which have fixed dimensions), but search results can quickly outgrow this tactic. If you don't want advanced search options, you can hide them from view. If you really still feel the sting of the loss of Google Desktop, you may want to consider a desktop search alternative that is. Desktop Search recommendations (for windows) Hi, I've been using the paid version of Copernic Desktop Search for many years, but bugs with PDF indexing and constant price rise, plius the turn to a subscription model, while not really providing new features, is making me look at alternative. You can hide the results dating from yesterday if you know they're irrelevant (in addition to refining your query to avoid them). The developers' solution to this problem is letting you collapse away superfluous parts of the interface. Copernic's interface is generally very friendly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |